# name
Research Domain Leerssen | Public Interface | nodegoat | East/West (Beller, Manfred)

# description
3:Concepts East/West Beller, Manfred

Kipling’s Ballad of East and West of 1889 (“Oh, East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet”) echoes the myth of historical clashes and cultural influences between the nations of the Eurasian landmass. The asymmetrical valorization of this East-West opposition, and its implied eurocentrism, can be traced back as far as Herodotus’s Histories and Aeschylus’s Persians: Greeks are represented as defending their liberty and democracy against imperial despotism encroaching westward from Asia. The East-West polarization springs from this opposition between Hellenes and Barbarians (Goldammer 1962: 9-20; Koselleck 1979: 187-196).
Literary testimony reflects the experience of large-scale migrations and cultural movements in the vegetational and economic zone of the northern hemisphere (Goldammer 1962: 31). Four periods in such a Eurasian history can be distinguished: the rise of the civilizations between Nile and Yellow River (3000-1500 BC); the Indo-European expansion (1500-0 BC); an Asian-based westward expansion (0-1500 AD) and the rise of Europe to global hegemony from the late Middle Ages onwards (Schaeder 1960: 25-47, 188-215). Karl Jaspers (1949: 94) succinctly sums up the European perspective as follows: “Die Griechen und die Perser, die Spaltung des römischen Imperiums in das Westreich und das Ostreich, westliches und östliches Christentum, das Abendland und der Islam, Europa und Asien, das sich seinerseits in vorderen, mittleren und fernen Orient gliedert, sind die einander folgenden Gestalten des Gegensatzes, in dem die Kulturen und Völker sich zugleich anziehen und abstossen. Darin hat sich jederzeit Europa konstituiert, während der Orient den Gegensatz von Europa erst übernahm und seinerseits europäisch verstand”. While there is certainly cause to speak of a self-positioning (Jaspers’ Konstituierung) of a ‘Western’ position vis-à-vis an Orient, the opposite is not the case. China has from ancient times seen itself as a ‘Middle Kingdom’ as opposed to barbarians from North and West.
As Donald Lach has shown (1977-93) Europe owes much to Oriental influence, techologies and inventions, a rich stock of literary and artistic influences and motifs, but also its Olympian pantheon, much of its mythological demons and monsters, and Christendom itself (the
European adaptation of a Near-Eastern type of monotheism). “A bird’s-eye view of East-West relationships in the arts leaves hardly any doubt that Europe received more than it gave. [...] Indeed, it was the uninterrupted contact of the West with non-European civilizations, particularly those of the Old World, that helped to foster the endless variety, vitality, and cosmopolitanism in our own art.” (Bowie 1966: 19; Fischer-Hansen 1988; cf. also Hundsbichler 1994). Accordingly, the deconstruction of myths of oriental despotism and stagnated isolation has undercut the “eurocentric myth of the West” (Hobson 2004). Nevertheless, technical and political developments have been arguably more successful in the West’s rise to global hegemony.
The European images of Oriental peoples and cultures ar determined by historical events, religious mores and fanciful imagination. The Biblical prophecy of the rapacious tribes of Gog and Magog (Ezechiel 38-39) served as a template for incursions by horse-mounted tribes from Central Asia. The Mongol invasions of the thirteenth century left terrified memories among the inhabitants of Eastern and Central Europe; the name of the Tatar tribes was changed to “Tartars” under the influence of their hellish reputation (Bezzola 1974). Conversely the civilization of India was legendary ever since the reports of the campaigns of Alexander the Great, witness the generally popular chivalric genre of the Alexander romance, with its descriptions of fabulous wealth, gymnosophists and curious animals. Late medieval travel writings like those of Marco Polo, Jean de Mandeville, or Ramusio’s collection Delle navigationi et viaggi (1550) helped to spread such themes, and also cast China, just then beginning to come into the European purview, in this same imaginated mould. In the image of Asian empires such as Persia, India, China and Japan, a proto-colonial European sense of superiority (cf. Demel 1992) vies with a ‘philosophical’ admiration for a refined lifestyle and wise government (Berger 1990, Hsia 1998).
The Hellenist mix of Near-Eastern cultures lasted from Alexander the Great until the expansion of Arabic Islam (Colpe 1990). Thenceforth, the Orient referred either to the Levantine region with, for its cultural centres, Persia, the Ottoman Emire and Egypt, or else the Maghreb including Marocco and Spanish Al-Andalus. The accompanying imagery features mosques and minarets, shaded courtyards and trickling fountains, harems and eunuchs, camels, caravanserais and Beduins (Hettner 1931), as well as despotism, slavery, cruelty, and the hateful enmity of Moor, Turk and Saracen. Conversely, in Oriental cultures ethnotypes exist of the crusading ‘Franks’ (Kabbani 1986, Khattab 1989).
In contemporary academic commentary, two matters need to be distinguished. One is the literary formulation of the Orient in medieval epic (continued in the fabulous eastern knights and princesses in Ariosto’s Orlando furioso and Tasso’s Gerusalemme liberata), or, much later, the poetic inspiration which Goethe received from the Divan of Hafiz, as well as the literary exoticism and allure of the East as evinced in the success of the Arabian Nights and of the Rubaiyyat. The other is the literature of hegemony and imperialism, e.g. the stories and verse of Kipling, as tackled by the postcolonial analysis of orientalism following Said 1978 (cf. Sardar 1999; for critiques, see MacKenzie 1995 and Benne 2002). Meanwhile, orientalism is thriving in a new guise. Starting in the early twentieth century with theosphically inspired fads for Oriental “gurus” and “swamis”, and reinforced by the counterculture discovery of Hinduism and Buddhism in the 1960s, the New Age sees things Oriental as an alternative to the rationalism, technocracy and soullessness which is condemned in the West’s cultural antecedents. Elsewhere, the orientalism debate has spawned the notion of occidentalism or the construction of ‘Westernness’ by non-European cultures and regions (Carrier 1995). In all of these cases, old images may be given new values, or inverted in their perspectival relationship, while leaving the underlying polarity in place.
The opposition between North and South is largely determined by climatological arguments (which, to be sure, are also activated in orientalist discourse); the opposition between West and East reflects historical events and political and religious cleavages. Its mythical character is demonstrated, however, by the mobility of the imputation of “Easternness”. The idea of despotic empires or cruel hordes threatening true civilization from the East can be applied in widely different contexts: the China-linked myth of the Yellow Peril around 1900; the term ‘Huns’ used in anti-German British propaganda during the First World War; the orientalization of ‘Asian’ bolshevism in the propaganda of the Third Reich, which by the same token sought to proclaim itself the champion of something it called ‘Europe’; the Cold War alignment between the opposition East-West and the antinomy of oppression and freedom; and the recent notion of a ‘clash of civilizations’. Much as the Orient stretches from Casablanca to Yokohama, so too can countries as widely diverse as Czechia and Israel see themselves as bulwarks of Western, Enlightenment traditions in a benighted Eastern setting, while the global centre of that ‘West’ has migrated away from Europe across the Atlantic. East and West have not met, but they have become blurred, and from points of the compass or historical spheres of influence have become ciphers of mythical and ideological values.

Word Count: 1173

AUTERI, L. & M. COTTONE, eds. (2005), <i>Deutsche Kultur und Islam am Mittelmeer</i> (Göppingen). —— BENNE, CHRISTIAN (2002), “Orientalismus? Fontane, Nietzsche und die ‘gelbe Gefahr’”, <i>arcadia</i> 37: 216-246. —— BERGER, WILLY RICHARD (1990), <i>China-Bild und China-Mode im Europa der Aufklärung</i> (Köln). —— BERNSEN, M. & M. NEUMANN, eds.
(2005), <i>Die französische Literatur des 19. Jahrhunderts und der Orientalismus</i> (Tübingen). —— BEZZOLA, GIAN ANDRI (1974), <i>Die Mongolen in abendländischer Sicht (1220-1270): Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Völkerbegegnungen</i> (Bern). —— BLANKS, D. R., ed. (1997), <i>Images of the Other: Europe and the Muslim world</i> (Cairo). —— BOWIE, T. R., ed. (1966), <i>East-West in art: Patterns of cultural and aesthetic relationships</i> (Bloomington, IN). —— CARRIER, J. G., ed. (1995), <i>Occidentalism: Images of the West</i> (Oxford). —— CLOT, ANDRÉ (1999), <i>L’Espagne musulmane, VIIIe au XVe siècle</i> (Paris). —— COLPE, CARSTEN (1990), “Von der Ausbreitung des Griechentums zur Enthellenisierung des Orients”, in <i>Orientalisches Mittelalter</i>, ed. W. Heinrichs (<i>Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft</i>, vol. 5; Wiesbaden): 31-67. —— CONERMANN, S. & J. KUSBER, eds. (1997), <i>Die Mongolen in Asien und Europa</i> (Frankfurt/M). —— DEMEL, WALTER (1992), “Europäisches Überlegenheitsgefühl und die Entdeckung Chinas: Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Rückwirkungen der europäischen Expansion auf Europa”, in <i>Kolumbus’ Erben: Europäische Expansion und überseeische Ethnien im Ersten Kolonialzeitalter, 1415-1815</i>, ed. T. Beck, A. Menninger & T. Schleich (Darmstadt): 99-143. —— DETRIE, M. & J.-M. MOURA, eds. (2001), <i>Penser et représenter l'Extrême-Orient</i>: special issue of <i>Revue de littérature comparée</i>, 75.297. —— EDWARDES, MICHAEL (1971), <i>East-West passage: The travel of ideas, arts, and inventions between Asia and the Western world</i> (London). —— ENGELS, O. & P. SCHREINER, eds. (1993), <i>Die Begegnung des Westens mit dem Osten</i> (Sigmaringen). —— Fang, Weigui (1992), <i>Das Chinabild in der deutschen Literatur, 1871-1933: Ein Beitrag zur komparatistischen Imagologie</i> (Frankfurt/M). —— FISCHER-HANSEN, T., ed. (1988), <i>East and West: Cultural relations in the ancient world</i> (Copenhagen). —— GOLDAMMER, KURT (1962), <i>Der Mythus von Ost und West: Eine kultur- und religionsgeschichtliche Betrachtung</i> (München). —— GREBER, ERIKA (1992), “Öst-westliche Spiegelungen: Der Doppelgänger als kulturkritische Metapher”, <i>Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte</i> 66: 539-594. —— HAFEZ, K., ed. (2000), <i>Islam and the West in the mass media: Fragmented images in a globalizing world </i>(Cresskill, NJ). —— HALBFASS, WILHELM (1981), <i>Indien und Europa: Perspektiven ihrer geistigen Begegnung</i> (Basel). —— HETTNER, ALFRED (1931), “Der Orient und die orientalische Kultur”, <i>Geographische Zeitschrift</i> 37: 193-210, 269-279, 341-350, 401-414. —— HOBSON, JOHN M. (2004), <i>The eastern origins of western civilisation</i> (Cambridge). —— HSIA, ADRIAN (1998), <i>Chinesia: The European construction of China in the literature of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries</i> (Tübingen). —— HUNDSBICHLER, H., ed. (1994), <i>Kommunikation zwischen Orient und Okzident: Alltag und Sachkultur</i> (Wien). —— JASPERS, KARL (1949), <i>Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte</i> (München). —— KABBANI, RANA (1986), <i>Europe’s myths of Orient: Devise and rule</i> (Basingstoke). —— KHATTAB, ALEYA (1989), <i>Das Bild der Franken in der arabischen Literatur des Mittelalters: Ein Beitrag zum Dialog über die Kreuzzüge</i> (Göppingen). —— KOSELLECK, REINHART (1979), “Zur historisch-politischen Semantik asymmetrischer Grundbegriffe”, in <i>Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten</i> (Frankfurt/M): 211-259. —— KURAN-BURÇOĞLU, NEDRET (2005), <i>Die Wandlungen des Türkenbildes in Europa vom 11. Jahrhundert bis zur heutigen Zeit: Eine kritische Perspektive</i> (Zürich). —— LACH, DONALD F. (1965-93), <i>Asia in the making of Europe</i> (9 vols.; Chicago). —— LECLERC, GÉRARD (2000), <i>La mondialisation culturelle: Les civilisations à l’épreuve</i> (Paris). —— MACKENZIE, JOHN M. (1995), <i>Orientalism: History, theory, and the arts</i> (Manchester). —— MANSELLI, R. (1983), “I popoli immaginari: Gog e Magog”, in <i>Popoli e paesi nella cultura altomedievale</i> (Spoleto): 487-517. —— MITRA, ANANDA (1999), <i>India through the western lens: Creating national images in film </i>(New Delhi). —— NANDY, ASHIS (1983), <i>The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism</i> (Oxford). —— <i>Orient und Okzident in der Kultur des Mittelalters</i> (1997; Greifswald). —— OUEIJAN, NAJI B. (1996), <i>The progress of an image: The East in English literature</i> (New York). —— OSTERHAMMEL, JÜRGEN (1998), <i>Die Entzauberung Asiens: Europa und die asiatischen Reiche im 18. Jahrhundert</i> (München). —— PEKAR, THOMAS (2003), <i>Der Japan-Diskurs im westlichen Kulturkontext (1860-1920): Reiseberichte, Literatur, Kunst</i> (München). —— REEVES, MINON (2000), <i>Muhammad in Europe</i> (New York). —— SAID, EDWARD W. (1978), <i>Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient</i> (New York). —— SARDAR, ZIAUDDIN (1999), <i>Orientalism </i>(Buckingham). —— SCHAEDER, HANS HEINRICH (1960), <i>Der Mensch in Orient und Okzident: Grundzüge einer eurasiatischen Geschichte</i> (München). —— SCHMIEDER, FELICITAS (1994), <i>Europa und die Fremden: Die Mongolen im Urteil des Abendlandes vom 13. bis in das 15. Jahrhundert</i> (Stuttgart). —— SÉNAC, PHILIPPE (1983), <i>L’image de l’Autre: l’Occident médiéval face à l’Islam</i> (Paris). —— SHIMADA, SHINGO (2000), <i>Die Erfindung Japans: Kulturelle Wechselwirkung und nationale Identitätskonstruktion</i> (Frankfurt/M). —— SIEVERNICH, G. & H. BUDDE, eds. (1989), <i>Europa und der Orient 800-1900</i> (Gütersloh). —— WHEATCROFT, ANDREW (2003), <i>Infidels: The conflict between Christendom and Islam</i> (London). —— ZIMMERMANN, A. & I. CREMER-RUEGENBERG, eds. (1984), <i>Orientalische Kultur und europäisches Mittelalter</i> (Berlin).

Word Count: 1052

— Originally printed in Manfred Beller & Joep Leerssen, Imagology: The Cultural Construction and Literary Representation of National Characters : a Critical Survey (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007), 315-319.
— The bibliography reflects the state of 2007; more recent titles may be found in the bibliographical interface of this website; please bring relevant critical literature to our attention.
— Do not use without proper referencing.
How-to-cite:
Beller, Manfred: “East/West”, in Imagology: The Cultural Construction and Literary Representation of National Characters : a Critical Survey, ed. Manfred Beller  & Joep Leerssen (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007, 315-319; online version at www.imagologica.eu posted 2 May 2019).

Word Count: 93